HUMANISTIC LANGUAGE TEACHING
&
CHOOSING YOUR EXPERIMENTAL LESSON
Task 1
We will discuss Qs 1-3 of the Pre-Session Task and draw up a list of Principles
of Humanistic Language Teaching
Consider the importance of 'affective' factors (Krashen's 'affective
filter').
A student with negative emotional responses / attitudes to learning will have
high affective filter - the teacher needs to create beneficial conditions
for language learning - a Non Threatening Learning Environment (NTLE)
"Teachers have responsibility to counter development of 'anxiety' (due
to negative experiences e.g. in speaking, lack of confidence) by building
self-confidence, positive learning experiences & environment, reassuring
feedback, promoting self-perception of developing proficiency." (Hedge)
'whole-person' learning (Carl Rogers)
Task 2
We will look at Stevick's criteria for
the choice of 'whole-learner' materials and reflect on:
To what extent do these criteria for materials match your own?
How 'whole-learner' are the materials you tend to use?
To what extent would you wish to be guided by the criteria Stevick proposes?
What does this reflect of your theory of what language is and how people learn
languages?
Task 3
"Humanistic language teaching principles tend to emphasise the
individuality of the learner in contrast to behaviourist techniques which
are more likely to impose a blanket of conformity on a learning group.
the
focus on the individual may itself be considered a Western cultural concept
..
imposed on peoples of a different culture base, this approach may lead to
conflict rather than harmony, and it might lead in reality to disengagement
from rather than engagement in learning.
Even imposed on people of a similar cultural base, it may be that the attention
to the individual in humanistic language teaching is seen as an 'unwarranted
intrusion on privacy'." (Wajnryb, R., Classroom Observation tasks, 1992:129,
CUP)
What experience can you bring to bear to support or counter these concepts?